AI/Vidia

Comparison · honest trade-offs

AI Vidia vs. in-house Midjourney.

No sales pitch. If in-house is the right answer for your team, we'll say so on the call.

Dimension

AI Vidia

In-house Midjourney

Weekly variant output
30–80 / brand
3–10 / brand (before burnout)
Character consistency
Locked — identical across 50+ ads
Drift within the first week without tooling
Brand-safe output
Review gate + tuned style system
Depends on operator taste and time
Ratio coverage
Every asset, every ratio, automated
Manual re-crop / re-generation per ratio
Testing workflow
Built-in: hook library → winners → scaling
Not standard — usually a separate hire
Hallucinated-hand risk
Caught in review — never ships
High — you see it on feed
Staffing required
None — we run the studio
1 senior creative + 1 operator + 1 QA
Time to first ad in account
72 hours
2–6 weeks to stand up
Total monthly cost (fully loaded)
€8K–€25K depending on cadence
€18K–€45K + overhead

When in-house wins

Keep it in-house if…

  • 01You need <10 variants a month and have strong internal creative talent.
  • 02You already run a production team with bandwidth to absorb AI tooling.
  • 03Your IP or compliance situation requires full internal control of the pipeline.

When AI Vidia wins

Hire us if…

  • 01You need 30+ new variants a week and a weekly testing cadence.
  • 02You can't afford (or justify) three senior hires to run the process.
  • 03Brand safety is non-negotiable and you need a review gate you don't run.
  • 04You want performance-creative thinking baked in, not a side project.

Not sure which fits? Ask us.